Introduction to MLflow and Kubeflow

As machine learning becomes more complex, MLOps tools like MLflow and Kubeflow help manage the ML lifecycle. But which one is right for your needs?
Key Differences at a Glance
Feature | MLflow | Kubeflow |
---|---|---|
Primary Focus | Experiment tracking, model registry | End-to-end ML pipelines on Kubernetes |
Deployment | Lightweight, standalone | Kubernetes-native |
Best For | Small to medium teams | Enterprise-scale ML |
License | Open-source (Apache 2.0) | Open-source (Apache 2.0) |
Cloud Support | All major clouds + on-prem | Kubernetes-based (GKE, EKS, AKS) |
1. Performance & Scalability
(Based on MLflow Benchmarks and Kubeflow Docs)
Metric | MLflow | Kubeflow |
---|---|---|
Max Concurrent Experiments | ~10,000 (SQL backend) | 100,000+ (K8s scaling) |
Pipeline Execution Time | Fast (local runs) | Slower (container orchestration) |
Auto-Scaling | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (K8s pods) |
Why Kubeflow Scales Better?
- Uses Kubernetes for distributed workloads.
- Supports multi-node training (TFJob, PyTorchJob).
Why MLflow is Faster for Tracking?
- Lightweight Python-first design.
- No container overhead.
2. Cost Comparison
Factor | MLflow | Kubeflow |
---|---|---|
License Cost | Free | Free |
Infrastructure Cost | Low (runs anywhere) | High (K8s cluster needed) |
Managed Services | Databricks MLflow ($) | Google Vertex AI, AWS SageMaker |
Pricing Examples:
- MLflow on Databricks: Starts at $0.07/DBU (~$500/month for small teams).
- Kubeflow on GKE: ~$300/month (3-node cluster).
3. When to Use Each?
Use MLflow If:
✔ You need experiment tracking & model registry.
✔ Your team uses Python-heavy workflows.
✔ You want quick setup (no Kubernetes).
Use Kubeflow If:
✔ You need large-scale distributed training.
✔ Your org already uses Kubernetes.
✔ You want end-to-end pipelines (data → deploy).
4. Deployment Options
Environment | MLflow | Kubeflow |
---|---|---|
Public Cloud | ✅ (AWS, Azure, GCP) | ✅ (EKS, GKE, AKS) |
On-Premise | ✅ (Docker, VM) | ✅ (K8s cluster) |
Hybrid | ✅ | ✅ |
5. Big Companies Using Them
MLflow Users
- Uber (Experiment tracking)
- LinkedIn (Model versioning)
- Comcast (Reproducible ML workflows)
Kubeflow Users
- Spotify (Recommendation systems)
- Lyft (Autonomous vehicle ML)
- Intel (Chip design optimization)
Sources: MLflow Case Studies, Kubeflow Adopters
6. Key Takeaways
- Choose MLflow for:
- Simple tracking & deployment
- Small/medium teams
- Non-Kubernetes environments
- Choose Kubeflow for:
- Enterprise-scale ML
- Existing Kubernetes infrastructure
- Complex pipelines
Hybrid Approach? Some companies use MLflow for tracking + Kubeflow for orchestration!
Which tool does your team use? Share your experience below!
In Tlatoanix, we can help your company to decide and implement the best tools for AI/ML workflows.
#MLOps #MachineLearning #Kubeflow #MLflow #AI #Tlatoanix
References
At Tlatoanix, we leverage AI tools to enhance research, drafting, and data analysis while ensuring human oversight for accuracy and relevance.