MLflow vs. Kubeflow: The Ultimate MLOps Showdown

Introduction to MLflow and Kubeflow

#MLOps #MachineLearning #Kubeflow #MLflow #AI #Tlatoanix

As machine learning becomes more complex, MLOps tools like MLflow and Kubeflow help manage the ML lifecycle. But which one is right for your needs?

Key Differences at a Glance

FeatureMLflowKubeflow
Primary FocusExperiment tracking, model registryEnd-to-end ML pipelines on Kubernetes
DeploymentLightweight, standaloneKubernetes-native
Best ForSmall to medium teamsEnterprise-scale ML
LicenseOpen-source (Apache 2.0)Open-source (Apache 2.0)
Cloud SupportAll major clouds + on-premKubernetes-based (GKE, EKS, AKS)

1. Performance & Scalability

(Based on MLflow Benchmarks and Kubeflow Docs)

MetricMLflowKubeflow
Max Concurrent Experiments~10,000 (SQL backend)100,000+ (K8s scaling)
Pipeline Execution TimeFast (local runs)Slower (container orchestration)
Auto-Scaling❌ No✅ Yes (K8s pods)

Why Kubeflow Scales Better?

  • Uses Kubernetes for distributed workloads.
  • Supports multi-node training (TFJob, PyTorchJob).

Why MLflow is Faster for Tracking?

  • Lightweight Python-first design.
  • No container overhead.

2. Cost Comparison

FactorMLflowKubeflow
License CostFreeFree
Infrastructure CostLow (runs anywhere)High (K8s cluster needed)
Managed ServicesDatabricks MLflow ($)Google Vertex AI, AWS SageMaker

Pricing Examples:

  • MLflow on Databricks: Starts at $0.07/DBU (~$500/month for small teams).
  • Kubeflow on GKE: ~$300/month (3-node cluster).

3. When to Use Each?

Use MLflow If:

✔ You need experiment tracking & model registry.
✔ Your team uses Python-heavy workflows.
✔ You want quick setup (no Kubernetes).

Use Kubeflow If:

✔ You need large-scale distributed training.
✔ Your org already uses Kubernetes.
✔ You want end-to-end pipelines (data → deploy).

4. Deployment Options

EnvironmentMLflowKubeflow
Public Cloud✅ (AWS, Azure, GCP)✅ (EKS, GKE, AKS)
On-Premise✅ (Docker, VM)✅ (K8s cluster)
Hybrid

5. Big Companies Using Them

MLflow Users

  • Uber (Experiment tracking)
  • LinkedIn (Model versioning)
  • Comcast (Reproducible ML workflows)

Kubeflow Users

  • Spotify (Recommendation systems)
  • Lyft (Autonomous vehicle ML)
  • Intel (Chip design optimization)

Sources: MLflow Case StudiesKubeflow Adopters

6. Key Takeaways

  • Choose MLflow for:
    • Simple tracking & deployment
    • Small/medium teams
    • Non-Kubernetes environments
  • Choose Kubeflow for:
    • Enterprise-scale ML
    • Existing Kubernetes infrastructure
    • Complex pipelines

Hybrid Approach? Some companies use MLflow for tracking + Kubeflow for orchestration!

Which tool does your team use? Share your experience below!

In Tlatoanix, we can help your company to decide and implement the best tools for AI/ML workflows.

#MLOps #MachineLearning #Kubeflow #MLflow #AI #Tlatoanix

References

  1. MLflow Official Docs
  2. Kubeflow Official Docs
  3. Databricks MLflow Pricing
At Tlatoanix, we leverage AI tools to enhance research, drafting, and data analysis while ensuring human oversight for accuracy and relevance.
Tlatoanix

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *